A Review on Multi-Storey RCC& Composite Building Under Seismic Effect using E-Tabs Software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30732/CSVTURJ.20211002004Keywords:
G 8 buildings ETABS, RCC, Steel and Steel concrete Composite frame building , Seismic analysis, nonlinear Time History Analysis methodAbstract
The Steel-concrete composite constructions are commonly used in modern construction. Due to its several advantages over RCC and steel structures, composite structures consisting of steel and concrete are particularly popular. The structural members of RCC buildings are heavier and have larger cross-sections. Steel constructions have higher deflections and flexibility than concrete structures, helping resistance to earthquake loads. In composite structures, the appropriate qualities of RCC and steel structures are blended. The composite structures facilitate lower costs, quick construction, and fire protection, among other attributes. Present study covers comparison of high-rise (G+8) RCC and composite structures in seismic zone IV considering the provisions of IS: 1893 (Part1) -2002. The seismic behaviour of frames created using the suggested methodology is assessed using ETABS software's nonlinear time-history analysis and the results are compared using various parametric data, for structures in all sorts of building frames, maximum storey displacement, storey stiffness, storey drift, fundamental time periods, base shear, and weight are determined. The steel-concrete composite frames, along with RCC and steel constructions, are best suited for medium to high rise buildings, according to comparative research.
References
Chatterjee, P., & Bhanja, S. Material Characteristics and Design Parameters for Limit State Method of Design as per IS: 456–2000 and IRC: 112–2011–A Comparison.
Kumar, M., & Rao, H. S. (2016). Seismic Analysis of Steel Concrete Composite System and its Contrast with RCC Structures. International Journal of Science and Research, 5(8).
Sharma, A. S., Priya, R. A., Thirugnanam, R., & Priya, P. R. (2016). Comparative Study on Multi-storey Structure of RCC and Composite Material. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(2).
Prajapati, B. D., & Panchal, D. R. (2013). Study of seismic and wind effect on multi storey RCC, steel and composite building. International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology, 6(4), 1836.
Charantimath S. S., Cholekar, S. B., & Birje Manjunath, M. (2014). Comparative Study on Structural Parameter of RCC and Composite Building. Civil and Environmental Research, ISSN, 2224-5790.
Mahajan, A. S., &Kalurkar, L. G. (2016). Performance Analysis of RCC and Steel Concrete Composite Structure Under Seismic Effect. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 5, 4.
Kumawat, M. S., & Kalurkar, L. G. (2014). Cost Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Structure. International Journal of structural and Civil Engineering Research) ISSN, 158-167.
Suthar K. P, & Butala Arjun M, (2020). Parametric study of G+15 R.C.C., steel and steel concrete composite building base4d on seismic analysis, U.V. Patel college of Engineering, Kherva (IJRASET), Volume 8 issue.
Kumar Nilesh, Ganwani V.and Jamkar, S.S. (2016). Comparative study on RCC and Steel concrete composite building using linear static analysis, Govt. College of Engineering, Aurangabad (MH), IJRD- International Journal for scientific Research &Development/vol.4, issue 02,
M. Vedha (2019). “Study of Seismic and wind effects of multi-storey RCC, Steel and Composite materials buildings using E-Tabs.” International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology.
DR. Panchal (2011), “Comparative study of building” RCC and Composite building (G+30 storey), Institute of Technology, Nirma University.
Renavikar Aniket, V., & Yogesh, S. (2016). Comparative Study on Analysis and Cost of RCC and Steel-Composite Structure. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(7), 1421-1425.
Sangave P. and Madur N. (2015), “Comparative Study of analysis and Design of RCC and Steel Concrete Composite Structure”. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, Vol-6, Issue 2.
Mujawar Zafar, “Comparative Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete, Steel and Composite Structures under the Effect of Static and Dynamic Loads”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol-4.
Mohite, M. N. A., Joshi, M. P., & Deulkar, D. W. (2015). Comparative Analysis of RCC and Steel-Concrete-Composite (B+ G+ 11 Storey) Building. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(10), 1-6.
Ali, S. F., & Bhalchandra, S. A. (2015). Study on seismic Analysis of RCC and steel-concrete composite structure and cost comparison with different support condition. International journal for scientific research and development.
Koppad S., & Itti S.V. “Comparative Study of RCC and Composite Multi-Storied Buildings” International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology.
Wagh, S. A., & Waghe, U. P. (2014). Comparative study of RCC and steel concrete composite structures. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, ISSN, 2248-9622.
Patil, U. P., & Suryanarayana, M. (2015). Analysis of G+15 RCC and composite structure having a soft storey at ground level by response spectrum and equivalent static methods using etabs 2013. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 2(3), 59-64.
Sharma, A., Mohammad S. K., (2016) “Behaviour of Symmatric RCC and Steel Frame Structures under Seismic and Wind Loading”. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, Vol 6.
Kapgate G., Prof. Budhlani D. L. (2018) Non-Linear Time History Analysis of Structure with and without Shear wall. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research. Volume 6 Issue 2.
Rathod K.V., Gupta S. (2020). A Nonlinear Time History Analysis of Ten storey RCC Building, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, Volume: 07 Issue: 06.
Patil, A. S., & Kumbhar, P. D. (2013). Time history analysis of multistoried RCC buildings for different seismic intensities. International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research, 2(3), 194-201.
Yadav, J. C., Reddy, L. R. P., (2017). Dynamic Analysis of G+20 Residential Building in Zone 2 and Zone 5 by using E-Tabs. International journal of Professional Engineering Studies, Volume VIII-Issue 3.
Panchal, A., & Dwivedi, R. (2017). Analysis and Design of G+ 6 Building in Different Seismic Zones of India. International Journal for Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6(7).
Inchara K.P., Ashwini G. (2016). A Study on Comparasion of percentage steel and concrete quantities of A.R.C. Irregular Building in Different Seismic Zones, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology Vol.03, Issue 08.
Mahesh, M. S., & Rao, M. D. B. P. (2014). Comparison of analysis and design of regular and irregular configuration of multi-Story building in various seismic zones and various types of soils using ETABS and STAAD. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 11(6), 45-52.
Reddy, A. P. K., & Kumar, R. M. P. (2017). Analysis of G+ 30 Highrise Buildings by Using Etabs for Various Frame Sections In Zone IV and Zone V. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology.
Kumar, E. P., Naresh, A., Nagajyothi, M., & Rajasekhar, M. (2014). Earthquake analysis of multi storied residential building-A case study. J. Eng. Res. Applic, 4, 59-64.
Juni, P. N., Gupta, S. C., & Patel, D. V. R. (2017). Nonlinear dynamic time history analysis of multistoried RCC residential G+ 23 building for different seismic intensities. International Journal of Engineering Research and Science, ISSN, 2395-6692.
Datta, T. K. (2010). Seismic analysis of structures. John Wiley & Sons.
Duggal, S. K. (2007). Earthquake resistant design of structures. New Delhi: Oxford university press.
IS 11384:1985,code of practice for design of composites structure”, Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, India.
IS:1893-2002, part 1,” Criteria for Earthquake resistant design of structures- General provisions and building”, Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, India.
IS 800:2007,” Indian standard code of practice for general construction in steel”, bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, India.
SP 16;1980,” design aids for reinforced concrete to IS; 456-1978 “bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, India.
IS:4326,” Indian Standards criteria for earthquake resistant design of structure (5th revision).
IS:875 (part 1 to 5): “code of practice for design loads for building and structures”, Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, India.
SP 34:1987, “Handbook on concrete reinforcement and detailing”, bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, India.
