Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis by Adaptive Boosting and Classification Tree using Voice Features
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30732/ijbbb.20170201002Keywords:
Adaptive Boosting, Classification Tree, Principal Component Analysis, Correlation, BradykinesiaAbstract
Parkinson’s disease is a widespread disease among elder population worldwide effecting approximately 6.3 million people across all genders, races and cultures. It is caused by dopamine loss, a chemical mediator that is responsible for body’s ability to control the movements. The disease reduces quality of life because of motor and non-motor complications. In this article Adaptive Boosting and Classification Tree based soft computing models are implemented to diagnose Parkinson’s disease using voice features. The soft computing models performances are evaluated on performance measures viz. true positive, false positive, false negative, true negative, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, RMSE on training and datasets. Finally a comparison is performed to identify the most efficient model and dataset combination. Adaptive Boosting model outperformed others on reduced feature vector dataset obtained by selecting prominent 15 principal components using principal component analysis, where, it demonstrated 100% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 0.0 RMSE on training dataset and 67.00% accuracy, 67.35% sensitivity, 66.67% specificity, 0.5745 RMSE on testing dataset.
References
[2] Rathore, C. P., Janghel, R. R., Verma, K., & Rathore, S. (2017). Comparative study of soft computing models for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis using gait features. National Conference On Signal Processing, Sustainable Energy Materials and Astronomy & Astrophysics, NSSEMA 2017, India
[3] Tsanas, A., Little, M. A., McSharry, P. E. & Ramig, L. O. (2010). Accurate telemonitoring of Parkinson's disease progression by noninvasive speech tests. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57(4), pp. 884-893. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2036000.
[4] Yadav, G., Kumar, Y., & Sahoo, G. (2011). Predication of Parkinson’s disease using data mining methods: a comparative analysis of tree, statistical and support vector machine classifiers. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, 65(6), pp. 231-42. doi: 10.4103/0019-5359.107023.
[5] Bocklet, T., Noth, E., Stemmer, G., Ruzickova, H., & Rusz, J. (2011). Detection of persons with Parkinson’s disease by acoustic, vocal, and prosodic analysis. IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding.
[6] Shirvan, R. A., & Tahami, E. (2011). Voice analysis for detecting Parkinson’s disease using Genetic Algorithm and KNN classification method. 18th Iranian Conference on BioMedical Engineering.
[7] Ji, W. & Li, Y. (2012). Energy-based feature ranking for assessing the dysphonia measurements in Parkinson detection. IET Signal Processing, 6(4), pp. 300–305.
[8] H. Xiao (2012). Diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using Genetic Algorithm and Support Vector Machine with acoustic characteristics. 5th International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics, 2012.
[9] Lichman, M. (2013). UCI Machine Learning Repository [http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml]. Irvine, CA: University of California, School of Information and Computer Science.
[10] Erdogdu Sakar, B., Isenkul, M., Sakar, C. O., Sertbas, A., Gurgen, F., Delil, S., Apaydin, H., & Kursun, O. (2013). Collection and analysis of a Parkinson speech dataset with multiple types of sound recordings. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 17(4), pp. 828-834.
[11] Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1999). A short introduction to boosting. Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, vol. 14(5), pp. 771-780.
[12] Timofeev, R. (2004). Classification and regression trees (CART) theory and applications. Center of Applied Statistics and Economics, pp. 7-39.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Notice will appear in About the Journal. It should describe for readers and authors whether the copyright holder is the author, journal, or a third party. It should include additional licensing agreements (e.g. CREATIVE COMMONS licenses) that grant rights to readers (see EXAMPLES), and it should provide the means for securing permissions, if necessary, for the use of the journal's content